Is Having Politicians in Charge of the Money Supply Like Having Dracula in Charge of the Blood Bank?

Is having politicians in charge of the money supply like having Dracula in charge of the blood bank?

Is Having Politicians in Charge of the Money Supply Like Having Dracula in Charge of the Blood Bank? 1

more like having bill clinton in charge of an all girl private college

— — — — — —

What happens when the money supply growth rate goes up?

in case you think of of money basically as yet another tradeable tool (which it incredibly is), the extra there is, the fewer it is worth (or the fewer you ought to purchase with it). In concept, if furnish grows thirteen% then its cost could shrink thirteen% yet there are different intangible aspects such the marketplace's own theory of cost that is affecting a curency's procuring potential and replace cost. additionally in case you unload extra earnings circulate, it takes it sluggish for all of it to percolate. by using that factor, the country's important economic employer has been monitoring inflation and could take action to stay away from further inflationary pressures (much less procuring potential), scuffling with procuring potential from being decreased by using the entire thirteen%

Is Having Politicians in Charge of the Money Supply Like Having Dracula in Charge of the Blood Bank? 2

— — — — — —

Have we been ripped off??? If we had 7.7 trillion in the money supply(2008) and we print 7 trillion more?

If the pie is full of roaches, it's not worth anything. But here's another thing to ponder. We've gifted over $13 trillion (and we are on the hook for potentially $23.7 trillion) to the criminal banksters to cover their gambling debts caused by the collapse in the housing mortgage market. But all mortgage and credit card debt of every American could be retired for only $11.5 trillion.

— — — — — —

How is the money supply increased throughout years?

Actually, the central bank increases the money supply by buying bonds. It cannot directly control the rates charged by commercial banks (unless the state also controls the banks)

— — — — — —

How can the Fed reduce money supply other than by raising interest rates or in some way reducing commercial bank lending?

'Money supply" is one of those 'economist-speak" terms that gets lost in the translation between economists and just plain regular folk.Realistically, we don't use 'money," we use credit with the occasional transaction being conducted in cash. 'Money Supply" is more or less meaningless from that perspective. What economists mean is the access to money, as in 'potential borrowers will be incentivised to borrow by lower interest rates, and discouraged by higher interest rates." Well, duh. But does that affect or impact the amount of currency in circulation? Not so much.The term goes back to the days of gold standards when realistically, and logically, if a government agreed to back its currency 100% with gold, the amount of circulating currency had to be contained to prevent the money supply from expanding beyond the amount of gold backing it. Very difficult to do when credit is introduced into the equation, and just one of the many reason that a 'gold standard" is simply not practical.How can the Fed reduce money supply other than by raising interest rates or in some way reducing commercial bank lending?

— — — — — —

What variables are to be considered to calculate the impact of the money supply on stock markets, and what tests can I do?

Also when you say money supply- is it money supply in the broader economy which may include global liquidy as well, which brodens the nature of study. I am pointing this because the loose monetary policy from the US and the Europen central banks had considerable impact on Indian stocks through FII money even though the monetary policy was highly conservative in India and the supply was tight.

— — — — — —

You ever get the impression that a lot of Liberals have no clue how economics works and money supply?

The OTHER 'mainstream' party has that problem and it's endemic with them. THATs why the likes of the Tea Party have many, many problems and the USA is paying for it, BIG TIME !!

— — — — — —

Given a limited money supply, does a rise in an individual's earnings imply that others now have less to spend?

yea...thats y its bad if somone hordes there money then again...the gov is always printing money but there is such a large amount of cash out there, an individual does not so much affect the overall....

— — — — — —

Did Obama really triple the money supply as some have suggested?

NO he just tripled our debt

the money supply related articles
Is It True Does Printing More Money Really Help Get Us Out of Debt?
What Are Some Ways to Keep My Hair Really Healthy?
How Was the First Sale of Vivo X60 Series?
Huami Technology Held a Press Conference on August 27, and Amazfit Smart Sports Watch 3 Officially A
Connect to Nonencrypted Wireless Network Using Ubuntu Commands

Copyright © 2020 Coffee bag - Guangzhou tianci packaging industry Co,. Ltd. | Sitemap