Where Did the "Luck O' the Irish" Idea Come From?

Where did the "Luck o' the Irish" idea come from?

Where Did the

There are a couple of common theories for the origin. It originated during the American gold & silver rush in the 19th century, the most successful miners were Irish or Irish American, some who became known as 'silver kings'. It's also where the "pot o' gold" saying came from. This is the most popular theory. Another is that despite hundreds of years of British trouble and (religious) prosecution Ireland still remains strong is what makes it pretty lucky.

— — — — — —

Civilization moved from Russia hundreds years ago, and settled in the rest of Europe. Actually, Swedish,?

I do not agree with it. Where is the evidence to show that the Celtic and Germanic peoples originated in Russia?

Where Did the

— — — — — —

what are the taboos of our society that people will look back on in hundreds of years in disgust?

Smoking cigarettes, crack, meth, our contribution of pollutants that permanently change our environment, and the treatment (or should I say ignoring) of our homeless citizens

— — — — — —

Could you help me answer these Science questions?

Vedic sciences (historic Vedic texts hundreds of years previous) answer each physique of those questions in the two Bhaghavad Gita (as that's) and Srimad Bhaghavatam translated into maximum languages by making use of Srila Prabhupada during the 70s. As cutting-component western technological know-how analyze those themes making use of western based sceintific technique and experimentation, lots of the widespread western theories experience the Vedic factors given in the classic Vedic slokas

— — — — — —

If the US was located in Europe for hundreds of years, would it still be as powerful as it is today?

it wouldnt be a country.it would be divided up by various European kingdoms. yes its possibel that one could conquer all the others the way that manifest destiny united all of the disparate American lands besides Canada and Mexico.all of European history would be vastly different if they had this much more land to work with. every war would be different, and every battle would involve different people.some, such as Napoleon might not even be born. so while the overal world is likely more backwards, the US would be what it always was. a battleground of various factions until one beats the others. its not like the US started as some great power. it lucked out by starting out as 13 colonies allied to an actual power (France) and slowly expanded westward against hapless natives (which dont exist here), bought Lousiana off of France, then beat the collapsing and hapless Spanish and Mexicans who coudlnt fight for shit. imagine the weakling the US could have become if Spain had kept their shit together or if France had. theyd be paling in the face of a "Super Mexico" to their west, and Super Canada to the North.who can really say how different its wars would have been had it been colonized by the celts thousands of years ago same as everywhere else as opposed to cut off until relatively recently. the reason the US is the way it is, is because the british colonists lacked any real rivals in their quest to conquer everything west of them. in this timeline thered be hundreds of different kingdoms all vying for dominance same as the other three continents.and like i said above, its of course possible one could unify all the others into a single super American empire like Rome and NapoleonIf the US was located in Europe for hundreds of years, would it still be as powerful as it is today?.

— — — — — —

Greece: prophecied about hundreds of years in advance, did you know?

maybe the book of daniel foretold that in general, someone would conquer the east from the west. at that time, though, i think the whole world knew that persia was scared of greece and Phillip II had been planning the asian invasion for a lifetime. if daniel said that this would happen, then he was obviously there during that time. there is no real document remaining from 2500 years ago, and it only takes 1 lie from 1 prominent person to change what people think. as for the q'uran, alexander is most definitely in it. he is portrayed by a name, Dhul Q'urain. the q'uran is even more specific about his existence than the book of daniel, as it accurately tells of how he destroyed the city of persepolis, built a wall around Gog and Mogue, and how he conquered the world until he died at the age of 33. get it right. he died at the age of 33. the bible or the book of daniel does not hint at the idea of alexander being a god, but other sources do. i hate to break it to you but years after jesus's death, the church burned all records of paganism and attempted to destroy the hellenic cultures. the point is, daniel may have written something different and the church would definitely have changed it, in the way they changed the real bible depicting jesus's life to a book of thoughts gathered by a few italian popes hundreds of years after his death. there is no point in reading these books as they are mostly untrue, so whatever was said about alexander was something made up by the church. they most likely sought to make daniel a saint or whatever, by faking the idea of him knowing the future. all of this was in an effort to make alexander lower than christianity. at the time, many people believed that alexander was an immortal god and thought that he was the greatest hero of all time.

hundreds of years related articles
What Are Some Ways to Keep My Hair Really Healthy?
How Was the First Sale of Vivo X60 Series?
Huami Technology Held a Press Conference on August 27, and Amazfit Smart Sports Watch 3 Officially A
Connect to Nonencrypted Wireless Network Using Ubuntu Commands
Is Time Travel Possible? Can We Travel Back in Time?

Copyright © 2020 Coffee bag - Guangzhou tianci packaging industry Co,. Ltd. | Sitemap